Barr: Brace Yourselves for 'Rain Tax'
Those who live, shop and attend church in Powder Springs will be paying triple for the stormwater fee, the former councilman says.
The City Council of the city of Powder Springs is set to vote on the dollar amount of the already-approved Stormwater Management Utility “Fee” on Monday at the regularly scheduled council meeting.
There are things you need to know about this so-called “fee,” which I have called a tax—a tax based on the rain that falls on our property. Will we be taxed later on the number of trees that are on our property because the wind blows the leaves into the streets?
The city says this is not a tax because it is not based on the value of the properties involved. I would disagree to the extent that the size of commercial buildings and churches, for example, and the parking areas adjacent to them reflect the value of the overall property.
Since these properties (churches, non-profits and commercial) will pay the “fee” based on the square footage of roofs, parking areas and other impervious surfaces, there is a relationship between the size and value of the property and the “fee” that will be paid. By the city’s definition, this “fee” is a tax.
Further, it is interesting that there is a provision of the zoning ordinance for the city that dictates a church must have a certain amount of land and paved parking—and now the mayor and council want to tax churches for having paved parking.
Most people are aware that the “fee” the city is proposing is $2 monthly for all residences to be paid annually with the property tax bill. While I still feel this is excessive to the city’s needs (they only paid $81,000 in Stormwater Management expenses in fiscal year 2010 and will collect more than $235,000 for 2012 calendar year) it is not overly expensive ($24 per year for 2012) to most residential property owners.
The problem comes from the additional amounts to be charged to churches, non-profits (like the American Legion) and business properties. Based on the square footage of the roofs and parking areas of these folks, the “fee” will likely be a multiple of $2 per month.
The American Legion is looking at more than $300 per year added to its expenses. There is at least one church on Marietta Street which will see a “fee” of more than $3,000 per year. With the first “fee,” due by the end of March 2012, and the 2013 “fee” coming on the property tax bill in the fall of 2012, two “fees” will need to be paid in 2012.
It should be noted that the current proposal is to increase the “fee” amount in increments of 50 cents each year until the rate climbs to $4 per month paid annually—$48 per year or an estimated $472,000 taken in by the city each year. What will that church on Marietta Street pay then? More than $6,000 per year?
Where do churches get the money to pay these fees? Where do non-profits and businesses get money to pay their expenses? The short answer: It comes from you.
Consider this: If you own a home within the city limits, you are going to pay $24 for 2012. If you attend church in the city, you will need to increase your giving in proportion to the amount the church will be charged—the number of members supporting the church will decide the additional amount each will pay.
And if you shop in the city, the additional expense to the store will have to be passed on to each customer in the form of higher prices or, at best, less discounts. How much extra comes from your pocket depends on how much you support your local businesses. You get a triple “fee”. And then double that since two “fees” must be paid in 2012.
We’re in a recession right now. Extra money is not easy to come by, and there are many personal and household expenses that must have high priority.
Why should I pay more in the city of Powder Springs for the same item that I can buy cheaper in Hiram, for example, since a Hiram business doesn’t have to pay this additional “fee”?
I support local businesses and buy locally when I can. I eat at Johnny’s, Los Portales, Pomarico’s and other restaurants in town. Increasing our businesses’ expenses in this economy is a bad idea, and creating a “business-friendly” environment for our businesses seems to be taking a back seat to handling the city’s budget problems.
Call and talk to the mayor and members of your City Council. Churches, non-profits and businesses can call 770-943-1666 and ask for Kim Peterson to find out what their “fee” is scheduled to be under the current proposal.
At the council meeting scheduled for Monday (the night before the election), you can sign up for the public comment and tell the mayor and council directly how this “fee” is going to affect you and your family, as well as your church and shopping habits. (You might even ask that the vote on the amount be tabled until all parties are provided with the amount of their “fee”; most churches and business won’t know their individual amount until they get a separate bill before the end of 2011.)
Monday’s meeting, scheduled for 7 p.m. at the Community Development building, may well be your last chance before the vote is taken to set the amount of the new tax that you will be paying for years to come.
—Ra Barr, Powder Springs
Young Resident
11:29 am on Monday, November 7, 2011
I sent an email to city officials and received a reply that the vote tonight on this issue has been tabled.
Jim Arnold
12:41 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011
Thanks "Young Resident" for your act of civic duty. I wish more of our young people would envolve themselves in such activities that will affect them when they become "Old Residents".
James
1:26 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011
I hate to say it but, I am sure the election had alot to do with it being tabled. If Mayor Vaughn wins, she will push to pass it.
Stan Kaady
2:59 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011
I placed two calls into city hall today. One to Kim Peterson and the other to Council Person for Ward 1, Cheryl Savris.
My concern with the SWF was whether home based businesses would be be assessed twice. The answer is no. Residences would only pay the fee once, whether they operate a business or not.
The other question I had stems from a letter I had written Mayor and Council back in August of this year suggesting that a credit or rebate be included in the SWF proposal. My wife and I are big proponents of water conservation. I encouraged them to consider as an incentive to help mitigate the additional fee for the citizens by offering rebates to property owners that are pro-active in preventing storm water runoff and water conservation by installing rain barrels, rain gardens and other conservation systems. I was pleased to hear from both Ms. Peterson and Ms. Sarvis that credits would be implemented as part of this process. I do not know the particulars or what formula will be used to determine these credits, but the information is available from Ms. Peterson.
James
1:31 pm on Monday, November 7, 2011
Citizens of Powder Springs, we need to vote anti-incumbent tomorrow (Tuesday November 8).
Tea Man
12:17 am on Tuesday, November 8, 2011
I agree with James. This RAIN TAX is a rain maker for city tax revenues and one way or the other it will line the pockets of incumbents eventually unless they go. Go here for the formula to change our city governance, 67 USA cities are now removing their incumbents, changing their charters and taking back control of their government - of the people, by the people, for the people, http://thereveredreview.com/