patching...
Breaking: Powder Springs Woman Held in Stepfather's Stabbing »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

City Attorney: Closed Meetings Within Law

The following is a response to former Councilman Tom Bevirt's Local Voices column on the City Council's executive sessions.

 

By Richard Calhoun
Powder Springs City Attorney

I believe a response to former Councilman Bevirt’s recent column regarding open meetings in Powder Springs is appropriate.

First, I am not aware of any complaints filed with, or by, the state Attorney General’s office alleging violations of the Opening Meetings Act by the City of Powder Springs.

As I understand it, where such complaints are made, the policy of the Attorney General’s office is to notify the government agency involved and request that the agency respond to the complaint.

To my knowledge the City has received no notice of any such complaints, nor, as city attorney have I received notice of any such complaints.

Secondly, with regard to the three permitted exceptions to the open meetings statute, and in particular the “personnel” exception, the topics which may be discussed under this exception include discussion, or deliberation upon:

1.)     appointment of a public officer or employee

2.)     employment of a public officer or employee

3.)     compensation of a public officer or employee

4.)     hiring of a public officer or employee

5.)     disciplining of a public officer or employee

6.)     dismissal of a public officer or employee

7.)     periodic evaluation of a public officer or employee; or

8.)     rating of a public officer or employee.

A discussion is “consideration of a subject by a group” and deliberation is “discussion and consideration of all sides of an issue; or “thoughtful, careful or lengthy consideration”.

Obviously, there can be quite a broad array of questions asked, statements made, facts debated and ideas exchanged which are relevant or material to a discussion or deliberation involving the above topics.

Furthermore, when other matters falling under the remaining statutory exceptions to the Open Meetings Act (land acquisition and consultation with legal counsel) are also addressed in closed session, the breadth of permitted topics of discussion and deliberation necessarily expands.

I am not aware of any instances where it could not be fairly said that executive session discussions by the Powder Springs Mayor and Council included topics which were neither relevant nor material to the matter under consideration pursuant to an identified exception to the Open Meetings Act.

Related Topics: Powder Springs Government

Just Curious 2

10:08 am on Thursday, March 22, 2012

Mr. City Attorney Man. Your letter should have opened with "The Mayor believes a response".... as she is the one who asked for you to respond.

You also stated, "Obviously, there can be quite a broad array of questions asked, statements made, facts debated and ideas exchanged which are relevant or material to a discussion or deliberation involving the above topics." Clearly, you have two former council persons not agreeing with you. But what do they know. They're just part of the OWS crowd. Face it. Off topic is off topic! And it does go on. Either you are not paying attention or you are too weak to speak up.

Reply

Vorant1

3:47 pm on Thursday, March 22, 2012

Mr. Calhoun
So who directed you to respond and who gets the bill? Her highness the mayor? Or city manager at her direction? Oh by the way, when was the last time the city bid out attorney services? I bet its been awhile and I also bet billing rates have gone up.....I know some of the answers but I'd like to see how honest you are.......

Reply

Pierce

7:03 pm on Thursday, April 12, 2012

Just Curious 2,

If you are going to attempt to disparage someone by opening your comment with "Mr. City Attorney Man" (when Richard Calhoun is clearly stated at the top of this page, in bold letters), at least have the intelligence to use complete sentences and proper punctuation throughout your statement.

With that said, I have to disagree with you. Clearly, Mr. Calhoun has done nothing but pay attention, hence why he is able to write such a thorough explanation.

Reply

Leave a comment