Powder Springs Mayor Warns of Closed Meeting Leaks
Pat Vaughn told council members that such disclosure, like information given to former Councilman Tom Bevirt, can result in sanctions.
Powder Springs Mayor Pat Vaughn sent a warning to City Council members before Monday’s legislative meeting, telling them that if they leak information from executive sessions, they “can be sanctioned.”
The warning stems from an email sent to council members by former three-term Councilman Tom Bevirt. The email, provided to Patch by Bevirt and posted at the bottom of this article, asks mostly questions but does reveal Bevirt found out the city will not utilize a selection committee in its search for a permanent city manager.
“He couldn’t have done this with his own mind,” Vaughn said of Bevirt’s knowledge of the situation, later adding, “You can laugh if you want to, but that’s an ethics charge.”
Bevirt has long pushed for the city to recruit a selection committee to help in finding a new city manager, just as it did in its police chief selection. Vaughn previously said the city would consider a city manager selection committee.
Rick Eckert resigned as city manager in February but was paid his full salary—$9,600 a month plus benefits—as a consultant through the end of May, when his two-year contract ended. Later in February, former Mayor Brad Hulsey was appointed interim city manager and has since been serving in that role at $6,000 monthly.
On Monday, Councilman Al Thurman, who hadn’t yet read Bevirt’s email, said he doesn’t “see where (what Bevirt knows) would be an issue” and began on a brief back-and-forth with the mayor.
“It shouldn’t be discussed, period, until the three finalists are announced,” Vaughn said.
“Correct me if I’m wrong,” Thurman said, “we are only dealing with issues that are discussed in executive session that are not to be discussed. Anything other than that, I don’t see your point.”
“Mr. Thurman, the point is who’s qualified and who’s not,” Vaughn said, referencing Bevirt’s question about whether those who have applied meet the position’s degree requirements. “That shouldn’t be going out to Mr. Bevirt. That is confidential."
“It’s not up to him to decide who’s qualified and who’s not,” she said.
The minimum qualifications are listed as: "bachelor's degree in public administration or related field; master's degree in public administration preferred; eight years of increasingly responsible experience in municipal or county government, including five years in a senior management role; or equivalent combination of education and local government experience."
Hulsey, an insurance agent, has a high school diploma and some college from Floyd Junior College and Georgia State University. He served as a Rockmart councilman from 1984 to 1991, a Powder Springs councilman from 1996 to 1999, and mayor from 2000 to 2003.
This information is listed on Hulsey's application for interim city manager, which is signed and dated Feb. 21—one day after he was voted into the position 4-0 by the council on Feb. 20.
During the public comment section of Monday's meeting, Bevirt was the only commenter. He first told council members that he has signed his full name, Thomas D. Bevirt, “since I was 7 years old,” alluding to Councilman Chris Wizner’s Patch comment accusing him of leaving a previous comment that was critical of the city.
Bevirt then repeated the questions in his email, to which the mayor responded that the council does not discuss personnel issues and “the applicants … do not want their names released and we will not release the names of any applicants until the three finalists, and we will clear it with them before we release the names of the three finalists. That is the process.”
“I’m not asking for any names to be released,” Bevirt said.
“Human Resources went through and selected and narrowed down,” the mayor said. “Council still has the option to look at as many as they do, and when they’re ready to make an announcement and decision, they will do that.”
After the meeting, Vaughn said out of about 50 original applicants, the city has narrowed them down to 12, but council members can still go back to the original applications if needed. There isn’t a timetable to when the three finalists will be named, she said.
Bevirt's email (unedited)
July 22, 2012
I am writing this note to inquire about several issues previously addressed:
1) Several months ago the Mayor was quoted in the PATCH that the Mayor & Council would have a selection committee made up of "city managers, mayors and HR persons" to help select names to be presented before you for the City Manager's job. This apparently was not done. Why is that?
2) The City Manager job posting clearly stated that the applicants must have a MS degree in Public Administration and a MS degree"preferred ". Are there any applicants who are being considered who do not meet those requirements. If so, why?
3) How many applicants applied for the job? Who gave the names to be considered by the council? How were they selected and on what basis?
4) What has happened to the DAPS? It is my understanding that there were three applicants? What became of them? If they were approved have they been sent for training? What are the plans for this important Authority which has over $100,000 in two accounts? I hope that you can give me some insight into these important matters.
Don’t miss any of the local news you care about. Subscribe to West Cobb Patch’s free newsletter, like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
Brad Hulsey - Interim City Manager
10:48 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Mr. Stone:
I feel compelled to write to you in response to this article, regarding my personal information being printed in the context of discussions about the City Manager applicants.
I was appointed as Interim City Manager in February of this year. I "hit the ground running" immediately, and I can assure all of the citizens of Powder Springs that I have given my utmost best effort toward managing the ongoing operations of the City in an effective and efficient manner. I am proud of my record of community service, and I have nothing to hide regarding my resume.
My main concern is this: A few months ago, you made an open records request with the City Clerk, requesting my application for employment for Interim City Manager from the City. Personal information about me is included in that application, but it is a matter of open record, which I respect.
Now, you have chosen to print this information in an article about the City Manager applicants. All matters pertaining to the City Manager hiring process are confidential, yet you have chosen to discuss my background in your article. Your article implies that I am a candidate for City Manager which, currently, is not a matter of public record. No other candidates for the position are mentioned. This is a breech in confidentiality and of due process, and I demand to know why you have chosen to discuss my background in the context of the process the City is undertaking regarding the hiring of a City Manager.
Michael Stone
11:06 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Hi Mr. Hulsey, thank you for your comment. I put that in the context of hiring an interim city manager, which is stated that you were in the article, because I would assume that the qualifications for hiring both an interim city manager and regular city manager are the same. If they are not, please let me know and I will be glad to post the qualifications for interim city manager in the article also.
JD Purify
11:20 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
I think it fare to sight the qualification of our interim City Manager and any other candidate who seeks a senior leadship position in government. I do under stand the nature of the HR process, but if you are currently acting in the position and your application is on file for an open records request....your information would be fare game in my mind, even if you have not applied for the permeate position. The article provided some clarity to how the selection process is being conducted....
Brad Hulsey - Interim City Manager
12:01 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Mr. Purify:
I appreciate your comments. As I stated in my initial posting, I understand and respect that my personal information included on my application for Interim City Manager is a matter of open record. I have no problem whatsoever with that. It is the context in which the article is written that I have concerns with.
CIty Dweller
11:21 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Uh oh...I see new targets in the Mayor's line of fire. Vengeance is hers, sayeth Pat Vaughn.
Ra Barr
11:38 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
In regards to Mr. Bevirt's email and Mrs. Vaughn's response:
There is no mention of requesting personnel information or personally identifiable information, he only asked about information concerning the PROCESS of selecting a city manager which should be no secret. The qualifications are stated on the request for applicants and any applicant not meeting the minimum qualifications should not be considered. The number of applicants and how they were screened are, likewise, part of the process and provide no identifiable information. Just because one prefers not to provide information about a personnel PROCESS does not make it a secret or confidential. This is a legal issue and the city attorney should be weighing in. There is no confidentiality in the PROCESS and Mr. Bevirt has not asked anyone to break confidentiality. In my humble opinion, the questions remain and why haven't Mr. Bevirt's questions been answered?
Brad Hulsey - Interim City Manager
11:51 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Mr. Stone:
As a former sportswriter for the Rome News-Tribune and the Rockmart Journal, I know that the worst thing that a reporter can do is "assume" anything. You've got to have your facts.
As to my meeting the qualifications as Interim City Manager, given the qualifications that you have posted in the article above for the City Manager position, I do meet the qualifications. If you do not believe that to be the case, why don't you come out and say it, instead of implying it.
I am proud of my record of accomplishment in my personal, public and private life. Whatever gifts and talents God has given me, I am blessed to share them in service to others. But when I feel compromised, I will speak out. Your article makes implications that, again, breech confidentiality and due process, and I ask that you consider this and be more cautious when reporting about the City Manager search process. My personal information has absolutely nothing to do with what Mr. Bevirt was discussing in his comments last evening. He (Mr. Bevirt) was talking about the hiring process of the City Manager, not the Interim City Manager. The hiring of the Interim City Manager took place way back in February. That would have been the time to discuss my qualifications, not now. Why would my name have even appeared in your article about the search for a permanent City Manager?
Michael Stone
12:04 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Hi Mr. Hulsey, thank you for your comment, and I apologize for the continued confusion. Since the position is the same and the only thing that varies is the length of time, I believe that assuming the job description is the same is a very fair assumption. I also never said that you didn't meet the qualifications nor did I imply it. In fact, I believe the article points out quite the opposite—that you are qualified based on the last part of the qualifications: "...or equivalent combination of education and local government experience." You're included in this article— among other reasons, most obviously because you're the interim city manager and part of the Powder Springs government administrative branch—because it discusses city manager qualifications. I feel that your qualifications being listed lays a good foundation for the type of candidates the city is looking for for the permanent position. Directly under your qualifications, the article clearly says they were listed on your application for interim city manager, not permanent city manager.