The Cobb Board of Education adopted an academic year 2013-14 calendar Thursday night that left some members of the appointed calendar committee disappointed.
By a 4-2 vote, the board approved a recommendation by Superintendent Michael Hinojosa for a 190-day instructional calendar that would begin on Aug. 7, 2013 and conclude on May 21, 2013.
Included in the vote was an amendment by board member Alison Bartlett to use fall semester instructional days for possible furlough days that may come up during future budget deliberations.
Hinojosa's recommendation was a modification of various proposals considered by the calendar committee, which was made up of parents and school system teachers and staff.
While that panel could not come to an agreement on starting dates, it expressed a general desire for more and longer breaks than what was approved, which has no full-week break in the fall before the Thanksgiving holiday (see attached PDF).
In a public comment session before the meeting, three calendar committee members said Hinojosa ignored their wishes.
"We came to a consensus with frequent breaks," said Smyrna parent Lisa Miler. "Dr. Hinojosa disregarded some important factors," upsetting her and others for not presenting his recommendation to the committee before making it public earlier this month.
While Hinojosa apologized to the calendar committee for that "mistake," he said that there were "a myriad of opinions on the topic" that prompted him to develop what he has termed a compromise.
"There was no clear consensus on the committee," Hinojosa said. "It was all over the place, no matter what they discussed.
"I did honor the intent of the committee. I don't really care what calendar we have, but a lot of people are wanting for us to make a decision."
Hinojosa proposed the creation of the committee to avoid future situations over the calendar that embroiled the board a year ago.
School board member David Banks, at the center of that calendar controversy, proposed at Thursday's meeting for a calendar to start on Aug. 5 and end on May 30, incorporating the longer breaks preferred by the calendar committee.
It was the same calendar he offered at this month's work session, but Banks was the only vote in favor of his amendment. He and outgoing board member Lynnda Eagle voted against final approval, with the latter objecting because of "all of the changes and all the amendments" that she said went against the board's intention of supporting whatever Hinojosa recommended.
In addition to Bartlett, board members Scott Sweeney, Tim Stultz and Kathleen Angelucci voted in favor of the Hinojosa calendar.
Board member David Morgan was absent from the meeting on family business.
Miller and other calendar committee members favoring the longer breaks wanted a school starting date of Aug. 1. But Sweeney pointed out that busy summer schedules for school construction projects, family vacations, student jobs and extracurricular activities like band camps would make that timeframe untenable.
Unlike last year, however, the disagreements were brief and the rhetoric wasn't nearly as sharp.
"Part of our own policy says that we respect what the public wants," Banks said right before the final vote. "And if we don't do that, we're not fulfilling our duty."
Don’t miss any of the local news you care about. Subscribe to West Cobb Patch’s free newsletter, like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
ITBS Grade Equivalency results improved for the first time since 2007 GHSWT passing rates improved by 4% Winter EOCT passing rates in math improved by 11% 8th Grade Writing Test passing rates improved by 5% 5th Grade Writing Test passing rates improved by 6% GHSGT passing rates improved by 2% Also, teachers were absent 15,000 fewer days than the previous year, which resulted in a direct financial savings of over 1 million dollars (the county didn't have to hire subs). Plus the students were taught by their teachers and not subs. Student absenteeism was down 27,600 days in the first semester of the balanced calendar school year (student attendance is a direct factor in AYP). This amounts to a decrease of 7.5% as compared to the first semester of the previous year. Out of 120 schools, 75.8% reported improvements in student attendance, and 24.2% reported an increase. You are always going to have some schools that under perform, that's just life. So do we punish others? However, our test scores continue to rise each year, so I don't think anyone can claim one calendar is better than the other as far as test scores. However, the savings in teacher absenteeism and the quality of learning that our students get by being taught by their teacher instead of a sub is obvious. And it's not all because of the new policy...that policy could have never led to that amount of days.
- Interesting point - Interesting how scores continue to go up, with dramatically reduced budgets and much larger class sizes; who would ever think that would happen "And it's not all because of the new policy...that policy could have never led to that amount of days." - you don't know that In any event, glad that the board did not put in place the calendar that starts July 31.
On the other note, if I don't know that the policy could have led to that many days, then I can say the same thing for your statement, how do you KNOW that "teacher absences decreased - as would be expected - because of new policy that warned teachers that absences would be considered in criteria to layoff teachers (with or without balanced calendar)."? I'm just using common sense....15,000? Really? I'm sure it's not a coincidence that they could schedule appointments throughout the year instead of squeezing them into a 9-10 week period (they don't have the full 11-12 weeks because of planning, etc).
- I'm just using common sense; Admin: Teachers, if your absences stand out - you may be cut. Teachers: Oh, I better not be absent as much. You were the one that put forth the incorrect suggestion that all 15,000 days were due to the Aug. 1 start date calendar - not me. I just brought you back to reality.