.
Feedback

Should Slow Left-Lane Drivers Be Ticketed?

A proposed state law would prohibit drivers from driving in the left-hand lane of the highway except when passing. Tell us what you think of the proposal.

Drivers later this year may be using the left-hand lanes of Georgia’s highways a little bit less if lawmakers greenlight a bill currently in front of state representatives.

House Bill 459 would amend state code by making it a violation to drive in a controlled-access highway’s left-hand lane except when overtaking and passing another vehicle. Driving in the left-hand lane would be OK when no other vehicles are directly behind a vehicle in question.

Other cases where left-lane driving would be acceptable would be when traffic and congestion make it impractical to drive in the right lane, when the right lane is obstructed or blocked, or when weather conditions make left-lane driving necessary. The law also would not apply when drivers are using left-lane exits, toll plazas or lanes such as those requiring Peach Pass.

Law enforcement vehicles, ambulances and other emergency vehicles, as well as those involved in highway maintenance or construction, would be exempt from the law.

If the bill meets the approval of the General Assembly and Gov. Nathan Deal, it would take effect July 1.

A copy of House Bill 459 is attached to this article.

Should lawmakers pass HB 459 and make it a violation to use a highway’s left-hand lane except for passing?

Share what’s on your mind with us, and then return here to see what your neighbors in Paulding, Douglas and Cobb have said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from West Cobb Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Woody J February 28, 2013 at 07:10 pm
We already have an unforced law that forbids side by side driving. Only Monday We were behind a left laner holding up traffic. When we finally got besides her in the right lane we see she is texting - that was from Concord Rd to Ridge Rd. on Atlanta Street. I say slow down or speed up and move over rover!
Dan March 1, 2013 at 12:58 pm
To the morons who think this is a bad idea-
Have you ever been to Germany? Driven on the Autobahn? Traffic moves smoothly there, because the drivers in that country have a little thing called Lane discipline. Having to pass on the right is extremely dangerous because that is the direction from which traffic merges. You should only be moving right when exiting, and you should only be far left when passing. It is simple courtesy, if someone is behind you and in a hurry, get your ass out of the way? What if that person behind you is rushing to the hospital? Are you such a careless and oblivious piece of cral that you won't follow simple rules of the road and get out of their way? Hell, I think left Kane camping should result in an automatic license suspension, just like it does in Germany. It's about safety, driver awareness, and being courteous to others on the road. Now I will undoubtedly encounter 25 left lane lurkers on my way to work this morning. My middle finger will at least get a workout.
Pam J March 1, 2013 at 03:00 pm
How about just giving tickets to the people on I-285 who are going 20 miles over the speed limit? I stay in the right lanes because those people are scary. This is a stupid conversation because if you are going the speed limit, or even five miles over it, you are legal, whichever lane you are in. If we leave the left lanes just for the speeders, aren't we creating a bigger problem? A slower driver may save you a ticket by slowing you down. It happened to me a few months ago. I was, I admit, going over the speed limit on South Cobb Drive. The two cars in both lanes were actually going the speed limit, but I really needed to get somewhere. I couldn't easily get around them. Good thing, since there was a police car parked on the side of the road with his radar gun pointed at cars a little further up.
Dan Mandersen March 1, 2013 at 04:13 pm
It isn't up to you, or anyone but the authorities to police other drivers speeds. It may come as a shock, but many people are capable of driving fast and doing so safely. In fact, I would argue that those drivers are more attentive than those putting along below the speed limit. Your only responsibility is to yield the left lane to others who are driving faster. That's it! By doing so, you are easing traffic congestion. Ever wonder why we see such big backups? It's typically because you have someone in the left lane who refuses to move, which causes a long line of traffic behind them that has nowhere to go. If you would simply pass and then move back right, other people could get around you. This is an elementary school concept.
Lowell March 1, 2013 at 06:53 pm
Don't like it, because "when traffic and congestion make it impractical to drive in the right lane" is too vague. What is "impractical"? Just because the road is at a standstill, it can be argued it is very "practical" to drive in the right lane because hundreds of cars are doing it at the time. This really is just poorly written. Much simpler and very close to this bill's real meaning is a "mandatory move-over" law simply making it a violation to block vehicles wishing to pass in the left lane, when (and only when) traffic in the other lanes is not congested to the point of moving below 50% of the posted speed limit. However, this really sounds like a bill to encourage speeders who can then be ticketed for revenue, keeping the left lane clear for them to blow by folks moving "with traffic" at whatever speed.
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 04:23 pm
Wrong. People exceeding the posted speed limit are a hazard.
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 04:28 pm
Agreed. Why should law abiding citizens be chastised for driving the speed limit? Why should they have to be constantly changing lanes to drive legally just so they make it possible for law breakers (speeders) to prevail?
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 04:32 pm
As long as you are driving the maximum speed limit, you should have the right to stay in the left lane. You can't be impeding the flow of traffic because you are already driving as fast as you are legally suppose to. Hey I have an idea. Why don't speeders just try obeying a law for a change? I can't believe we have now gone to condoning more law breaking!
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 04:35 pm
I have received 3 tickets for the same thing. None can stick because they can't legally tell you to speed. Keep driving the speed limit. I think they should worry mor about hte people speeding than the people obeying the law. Just saying
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 04:38 pm
You think tailgating and texting and driving should be unlawful and enforced, but speeding should be OK. Something wrong with that thought. Speeding is also illegal. Don't pick and choose laws to fit your preferences!
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 04:39 pm
As long as they ticket speeders and tailgaters and road rage warriors!
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 04:42 pm
The whole purpose of the law is that even law enforcement and government officials can't contain themselves and feel it is necessary to speed. This is just a way to get the law abiding citizens out of the way so they can speed.
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 04:43 pm
Agree. Drive the speed limit!
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 04:43 pm
Yes. But only if you are driving LESS than the speed limit.
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 04:45 pm
Why don't you just drive the speed limit. Why enforce a law to allow you to break another? Sounds selfish to me.
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 04:47 pm
Well said. My words exactly. If you are doing the speed limit in the left lane you shouldn't be holding up traffic. You are going as fast as anyone SHOULD be!
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 04:50 pm
You make it sound like because someone is driving the speed limit and you want to speed, that you HAVE to pass. Try driving the speed limit as well. You do not HAVE to pass to break the law, but we have to obey a law to allow you to break the law. Absurd!
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 04:54 pm
I agree completely. Only part that is wrong is that 5 miles over is illegal.
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 04:59 pm
But, Dan. If the people in front are doing the speed limit, how is that holding up traffic? It just means that traffic is heavy. Are you saying that we need people speeding to avoid traffic congestion? Dumb!
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 05:01 pm
Not really the issue. It is that the police and government officials are law breakers themselves and can't refrain from speeding. This just allows speeders to continue breaking the law.
David Baringer March 2, 2013 at 05:03 pm
I think that people driving the speed limit are setting a good example. If everyone drove the speed limit our roads would be much safer. Accidents are caused by people breaking the law not abiding by it.
Dick Jones March 3, 2013 at 01:36 pm
When I lived in Los Angeles, rush hour was bad because there were just too many cars. In Georgia, rush hours is bad because bone head drivers drive under the speed limit in the fast lane and impede the traffic flow. For those who can actually read, there are already signs up and down the interstate that say "Slower Traffic Move To The Right". At 5:30 am every morning, I see countless cars in the fast lane doing 50 MPH with no one in front of them for a mile. Why can't they realize that they are"slower traffic" and "MOVE TO THE RIGHT"??
Beverly Magill Denney March 3, 2013 at 02:59 pm
The bill doesn't target Atlanta. It is a State bill!
And the bill isn't incouraging speeding,it would get those out of the way that are going below the speed limit and tying up traffic. It is a shame that we have to legistate common sense!
Robert March 4, 2013 at 07:02 pm
40-6-184. Impeding traffic flow; minimum speed in left-hand lanes
(a) (1) No person shall drive a motor vehicle at such a slow speed as to impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, except when reduced speed is necessary for safe operation. (2) On roads, streets, or highways with two or more lanes allowing for movement in the same direction, no person shall continue to operate a motor vehicle in the most left-hand lane at less than the maximum lawful speed limit once such person knows or should reasonably know that he is being overtaken in such lane from the rear by a motor vehicle traveling at a higher rate of speed, except when such motor vehicle is preparing for a left turn.
Greg T March 6, 2013 at 05:42 pm
David, people exceeding the speed limit are not a hazard. It is those who go above or below the speed others are traveling at that causes a safety hazard. That is a fact no matter what you believe about the law.
Drivers going slower or faster than the crowd are hazardous, regardless of the posted speed limit.
Haz March 6, 2013 at 06:54 pm
I completely agree with David, Atlanta metro has some of the worst speeders in the country, they are a hazard! I drive on 400 everyday and see speeders cutting people off and weaving in between lanes often causing accidents. I wish we would increase our fines for speeders, they place everyone's safety in jeopardy.
Greg T March 6, 2013 at 07:25 pm
Haz, that would be an example of going faster than the crowd. Both are hazardous, but we already have laws against reckless drivers?
Getover March 20, 2013 at 12:29 pm
I have read all these comments and apparently most of you are too young to remember 2 lane highwys. You didn't have a choice but to stay right. All these comments about speeders sounds like left hand drivers are trying to control the road by limiting how fast people drive. That is not for you to decide!! Mind your own business not my speedometer! Speeders will pass you and you can go on with your oblivious life!! So quit being a left hand lane police and just get over!!! Its bad road manners no matter what you think!!
stephen m george jr mpa May 19, 2013 at 12:39 am
What part of "except when overtaking and passing another vehicle" does the state not understand this law will in reality promote higher speeds and more accidents ...because everyone else is going to be doing at least the speed limit ...!
stephen m george jr mpa May 19, 2013 at 12:41 am
sounds reasonable ...so why change the law?
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Susan Smelser June 18, 2013 at 06:48 pm
This thread makes me sad;o(
Susan Smelser June 18, 2013 at 06:54 pm
As a business owner of The Book Worm Bookstore downtown, you may think we are all failing but thatRead More is simply not true. There are some good businesses there and we are not going anywhere. I agree, changes NEED to made to our current system of attracting new businesses but there are underlying reasons why businesses fail. More times than not, businesses open with no business plan on how to stay open, ideas that were simply not researched enough as well as not keeping regular business hours which make people stop coming back. Another overwhelming reason for many businesses to fail would be that Powder Springs does NOT support all the new businesses that open. Shopping anywhere once a year or waiting for a neighbor to tell you how they liked a new restaurant or shop, cannot keep a new business open. On the other hand, if you have a business that has what customers want, has good customer service and is priced right, a successful business can be had. I hope you both have shopped some of the businesses yourself, that is the first step to supporting your downtown businesses and keeping them open.
Jon June 18, 2013 at 07:54 pm
Susan - I agree in principle, especially about poor business planning and research. One goodRead More example: did anyone seriously think that a fancy tea house was a good long-term business model for our middle- to lower-middle class area? As far as the people of Powder Springs shopping at businesses on the Square more than once a year - can you name a single business on the Square that has a business model that encourages frequent visits - including yours? I can only really think of five retail-focused businesses on the square off the top of my head: The antique shop, the flower shop, your book store, the hair salon, and that awful Mexican restaurant. Other than the restaurant, those are not businesses that bring people back to the area frequently, and I don't even think the restaurant is open for dinner any more. There's one other big issue to consider, though, especially for retail businesses such as yours: Drive-by traffic, or the lack thereof. The larger shopping district on Sailors Parkway gets ten times the drive-by traffic that the Square does, and for good reason - I don't think many people would voluntarily choose to drive through a notorious speed trap with a 25MPH speed limit and an at-grade railroad crossing when there's a 45MPH four-lane divided highway a half-mile away.
Greg T June 7, 2013 at 09:56 pm
Joel, the speech in front of the Woodrow Wilson Center is even more ironic and scary. Wilson was aRead More scary president because he jailed his political opponents for opposing the war after campaigning to keep us out of WWI. Also, his hatred of black Americans showed no humanity even after blacks voted overwhelmingly for him.
Ambo June 11, 2013 at 05:05 pm
This is exactly why I talk about my inflamed hemorrhoids on the phone every time I call someone! IRead More usually blame it on the IRS!
Marlene Mitchell June 13, 2013 at 06:49 pm
Pam J, Please don' t assume that Verizon is the only company.....it is everyone of them. VerizonRead More is the only one we have been told about. :(
CLUBFV June 6, 2013 at 04:42 pm
New cartoon show coming soon to a channel near you "NAMBLA Man" This superhero fightingRead More against all the evil powers that would deny him and his ilk of young male bodies.
EthelToffelmayer June 6, 2013 at 07:18 pm
And yet there has to be something that made you develop that opinion. I'm fascinated to hear whatRead More makes someone develop a personal belief that is so utterly reductive. The "anecodotal (sic) and opinion evidence (whatever that is...)" that created my belief is informed by empathy, compassion, understanding, and open-mindedness. What have you got?
Christopher Straub June 13, 2013 at 09:08 pm
Might recheck history; this nation was founded on religious freedom. You write as if you haveRead More disdain for other faiths, such as the one Jesus was a part of - you might remember, it was Judaism. Thought that was in the Bible - all the iterations, even the politically re-written versions.
Joel Clark June 11, 2013 at 12:31 pm
Most people don't know that the Trident originally had no eagle on it until the Navy made it anRead More exclusive Seal emblem... as a UDT member from the EOD side it pi$$ed a lot of us off that it was taken away. Seals had buds, basic underwater demolition and we had studs, strategic tactics underwater demolition. Anyway, we should have a cup of coffee, I bet we swam some of the same waters. Nihil Obstat, brother..
MA Evans June 12, 2013 at 12:22 am
Our youth are engaging in acts before their minds and bodies are ready for the acts.
JB June 12, 2013 at 11:57 am
@KJL: My have three children. It never ceased to amaze me the stories they would tell about friendsRead More having oral sex because "that isn't sex"- and about how young the friends were when they started. If information will help us to combat this problem then, yes, we should obtain it. For parents who think this will lead to your children thinking they are abnormal, think again. The fact that their friends are and they aren't already makes them feel that way. And if you think that this battle can be handled in the home, it should- and on every other front we can find.
exe May 24, 2013 at 05:12 pm
Frankly, I don't believe anyone NEEDS or has the RIGHT to expect a Bible or any religious book at aRead More state park. I go to enjoy the outdoors. Anyone who wants to bring their own religious text is free to do so. It is not right for the state parks to give the impression that they are in favor of certain religions and beliefs and not others.
stephen m george jr mpa May 24, 2013 at 05:43 pm
that book also explicitly states: "There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor aRead More SODOMITE of the sons of Israel," -Deuteronomy 23:17
Richard Pellegrino May 25, 2013 at 06:52 am
Stephen: Just because a text explicitly states something does that mean there is only one meaningRead More and interpretation of that verse or biblical text? For example the one you quoted have many different interpretations and meanings, most of which do not even indirectly relate to homosexuality. On another note...you seem to be a student of the Bible and ancient texts, as well as someone who is versed in many subjects. We have small group discussions on some of these topics, sometimes at my home, other friends' homes, and sometimes at coffee shops or other public places. And I often seek out those whose opinions or understandings may be different than mine to participate--not to debate whose opinion is right (though certainly some of that takes place) but to learn from each other and try to find some commonalities. If you think you might like to participate sometime feel free to contact me directly at pilgrim1@mindspring.com (and this goes for other bloggers too).
ray jay May 20, 2013 at 06:13 pm
Look for all you obama supporters y'all need to shut up. There was a ton of evidence, speculationRead More and everything else showing this president and his administration were and are as crookex as a dogs hind leg. Y'all idiots voted him back in at least that what they say I'm still not sure it wasn't a rigged election you know the kinds they have in russia? If there was a picture of president obama snortin coke off the oval office desk and a whore under each arm and him toasting the leader of iran y'all would still worship this creep.
ray jay May 20, 2013 at 06:14 pm
Bush was a honest and loyal president who had morals!!!!
Andrew Blawat May 20, 2013 at 08:55 pm
Spout all your usual lies and propaganda you want as no one believes your lies anyway libtard.