.

Off The Hook (why the all-volunteer Army is wrong for America) Part I

In our democracy. the current arrangement of an all-volunteer Army is not an appropriate instrument for fighting wars of our collective choosing.

In 1999, with war sweeping through the wreckage of what was once Yugoslavia, I bobbled my three-year old son Matthew on my knee as together we watched a television newscast that quite unexpectedly began broadcasting images of a burned-out civilian bus that had been accidentally targeted by a NATO missile.

Matthew was too young to be upset by any of this, but I was upset in the way that a new parent is upset whenever certain, harsh realities intrude upon their children.

I was still at that early phase of parenthood that had me marveling at the length of Matthew’s eye lashes, the crystal depth of his hazel-brown eyes, and the soft feel of his feet and hands. He was everything lovely and innocent in a child and I just couldn’t square that innocence with the horror unfolding in front of us on that TV screen.

What I felt was shame and embarrassment, as if I or my adult world had been found out, and revealed in its immorality and imperfection. And looking at Matthew, I wondered how I could ever “explain” any of this to him.

A few short years later our country found itself involved, yet again, in another war, the conflict in Iraq.

As was my habit at the time, I would go at dusk to sit in the wooden stands down in the Arroyo where a cool breeze seemed always to gather no matter how hot the day, and together with several other fathers, watch our sons play baseball.

The smiles were always easy, the banter good-natured and generous, the kind of peaceful, small-town ritual that gives small towns and fathers a good name. I don’t think any of us sitting there in that golden light ever imagined that our young boys who were only 9 or 10 at the time could possibly be exposed to the fighting in Iraq, but five or six years later as the conflict dragged on, that notion was no longer an abstraction.

I knew at least one, slightly older boy who had joined the National Guard seeking direction and benefits only to find himself facing live-fire in Iraq. And though I never asked, I often wondered, which of those fathers who had watched on countless nights their sons running, throwing and gliding across grassy fields would press for their sons to fight in Iraq?

Who among those fathers would not literally move a mountain to keep their sons safe and away from the killing ground of that war?

As an American citizen, I am certainly aware of the point of view that represents war as a regrettable necessity in an imperfect world. I would not argue that the flawed and aggressive history of mankind has not been steeped in war, but I would never celebrate any of the so called virtues of war without first acknowledging that at its core, no matter what the cause or justification, war represents not the greatest test and virtue of mankind, but its greatest failure.

That being said, I would also never advocate for the unilateral disarmament of our nation, which must, despite its best inclinations, exist in a world that largely rejects my premise, celebrates military prowess, and tends to war at will.

But there is, at least for me, a rub. If in a democratic society the people, who are not compelled to fight by a dictator or by laws not of their making, embrace war as an acceptable means for the settling of disputes among nations, then those same people cannot in good conscience hold that position without simultaneously and assertively making themselves and their children available to fight.

In our democracy the current arrangement of an all-volunteer Army is not an appropriate instrument for fighting wars of our collective choosing. Rather, it is a convenient and immoral act of self-deceit, which enhances rather than deters the possibility of future wars.

It does so by placing the vast majority of citizens at a comfortable distance from the bloody effects of the war policies they support. And it does so by undemocratically distributing the pain and suffering of war among a willing, yes, but unacceptably small segment of our society.

In the roughly ten years of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, fewer than 1% of the adult population of the United States has participated in the fighting...(to be continued)

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Powder Springs May 17, 2012 at 12:53 PM
I wholeheartedly agree with your article. I always find it funny, that the very same people who always want military intervention all over the globe won't enlist during war time or peace.. We refer to them as keyboard commando's. They advocate harsh tactic, they themselves would not perform!!
Robert Defulgentiis May 17, 2012 at 04:57 PM
Well Powder Springs, it's just one of those things that makes citizenship "optional" in this country. I'm writing this piece from a very war-abhorring POV, but I cannot swallow the convenient, off the hook "out" that the all-volunteer army grants to citizens of this country, who, as you say "advocate harsh tactics" without ever involving themselves and their children in such tactics.
Powder Springs May 17, 2012 at 06:33 PM
a lot of the neocons you see and hear on tv. They advocate war all around the globe. However, when it's time to put on a set of BDU's "during my time in the Army" or ACU now. They run an hide, be it Vietnam, Operation Desert Storm/Shield, Kosovo,OIF and so on
Holly Hale September 06, 2012 at 04:29 PM
Did you serve, Robert "leaning left?"

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »